RE: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?

From
Daniel Engovatov <>
Date
2004-03-05T18:14:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?




From: "Daniel Engovatov" <>
To: "Polar Humenn" <>, "Anne Anderson" <>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:27:28 -0800








> On 4 March, Frank Siebenlist writes: Re: [xacml] request's attribute
assertion lifetime?
>  > It just intrigues me why we have this InstantIssue element of the
attribute
>  > defined? What was the use case for that?
>
> Good question.  I think it should be removed.  Why didn't we
> include validity interval?  It would have made more sense, but we
> didn't.  I think both fall into the category of "things the
> Context Handler is supposed to check".

>I whole heartily agree, but I think you already knew that. :)


Second that.   You knew that too. :)