RE: [xacml] legal values for Strings

From
Satoshi Hada <>
Date
2004-03-24T07:27:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xacml] legal values for Strings
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

xacml message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [xacml] legal values for Strings

From: Satoshi Hada <>

To: 

Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:42:19 +0900

I think that all these responses agree that we should
correct
the test cases for obligations as per Seth's comment:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-comment/200403/msg00003.html

PS:
The attribute selector example was the reason why
I (wrongly?) thought that 
all the attribute assignments must be written like

 <AttributeAssignment
     AttributeId="..."
     DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">
     <AttributeValue DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">assignment1</AttributeValue>
 </AttributeAssignment>

Satoshi Hada

IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory

mailto:

"Daniel Engovatov"
<> 

2004/03/24 05:25

To

"Seth Proctor"
<>

cc

<>

Subject

RE: [xacml] legal values
for Strings

Yep.  That is most definitely a type error that
we should not make.

<AttributeSelector> is not of data type ":string"