Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?

From
Seth Proctor <>
Date
2004-03-16T19:13:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->























xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] request's attribute assertion lifetime?




From: Seth Proctor <>
To: XACML TC <>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:27:35 -0500








On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 16:53, Frank Siebenlist wrote:
> Polar Humenn wrote:
> 
> > If you take the approach that all attributes have validity intervals, then
> > they may have many validity intervals. Hmmm, how about the Cantor set?
> 
> ... and definitely not a Cantor Set like problem ... which I take to be some 
> attempt of humor by a (perverted) mathematician ... ;-)

For those who are curious, a Cantor set is (without getting too precise
and mathy) a set that is closed but disconnected. The cannonical example
is the Cantor Middle-Thirds set, which is constructed by removing the
middle third from a set, removing the middle third from the remaining
sets, etc. This results in "a lot" of intervals :)


seth
Next in thread → Next in month →