MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
xacml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL
From: bill parducci <>
To: XACML TC <>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:14:26 -0700
i agree with polar, this proposal falls in line with what i think is
common with SAML: profiling. i don't read it as saying, 'THOU SHALT
WRITE WSPL POLICIES THUS,' but rather, ' IF you are writing polices for
WSPL that are expressed in XACML, here is how it would be done.' in that
context the examples tim provides seem reasonable and within the charter
of the TC.
b
Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>
>
>
> Anne,
>
> I would also have to object and say that is out of scope for the XACML TC
> and is expanding the charter which is not allowed. The document clearly
> talks about Policy in a general term.
>
> I'm also not sure what you mean by "then perhaps we should start a new
> OASIS TC for it"
>
> As far as Polar's comment, time will tell as it did for Corba.
>
> Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122
