My concern is that its been developed in a public standards body work group
where there were concerns over RF, so has this been declared RF or does it
carry same terms as XACML 1.0 ?
Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Anne Anderson |
| | <Anne.Anderson@Su|
| | n.com> |
| | |
| | 07/29/2003 01:11 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | Anne.Anderson |
|---------+---------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS |
| cc: XACML TC <> |
| Subject: RE: [xacml] WSPL item for 7 August XACML TC Agenda |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Tony,
To the best of my knowledge, there are no patents or other
proprietary or intellectual property rights pertaining to the
XACML WSPL specification. The authors and contributors have none,
and none have been disclosed, and it has been developed in a
public standards body where potential claimants should have been
put on notice. Therefore, I see no reason why it would not be
royalty free.
Are you aware of any rights pertaining to this specification? If
so, please let us know.
Anne
--
Anne H. Anderson Email:
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
