Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xacml] Conclusions from the May 22 XACML focus group concall...

From
Anne Anderson <>
Date
2003-05-23T17:26:34+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xacml] Conclusions from the May 22 XACML focus group concall...
Ditto.  -Anne

On 23 May, bill parducci writes: Re: [xacml] Conclusions from the May 22 XACML focus group concall...
 > From: bill parducci <>
 > To: XACML <>
 > Subject: Re: [xacml] Conclusions from the May 22 XACML focus group concall...
 > Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:10:10 -0700
 > 
 > Polar Humenn wrote:
 > > I have a question about proposal H. Rule References.
 > > Are rule references allowed to reference rules outside of the policy?
 > 
 > if it doesn't then i am not sure what value references will have. ;-)
 > 
 > > Currently, the only way for a rule to exist is to be defined within a
 > > Policy. If rules are going to exist outside the policy, then I believe
 > > there needs to be a section on how a rule is defined.
 > 
 > i agree. i believe that this will require us to consider the RULE as the 
 > most granular unit. this should [re]introduce a number of specification 
 > changes.
 > 
 > b
 > 
 > 
 > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php

-- 
Anne H. Anderson             Email: 
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692
Next in thread → Next in month →