On 12 February, Satoshi Hada writes: Re: [xacml] Reviewed os 1.0 Draft 3
> This makes sense to me.
>
> >> If a user of XACML wants to return a consistent set of
> >> Obligations, then the user must define a new combining
> >> algorithm that specifies the order of evaluation or requires
> >> that all components of the policy must be fully evaluated.
>
> So should I conclude that it's difficult to create conformance test cases
> for testing obligations in case of the standard POLICY combining
> algorithms?
> (I know it's possible to create them in case of the standard RULE combining
> algorithms.)
Yes, I think it would be difficult. Anyone else thought about this?
Anne
--
Anne H. Anderson Email:
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
