that would be a contradiction to the decision made by the group some
months ago, and for good reason in my mind: if nothing can be assumed
about the intended use of the azn results, there is little hope of
reproducible access control.
this is position also consistent with the solving the functionality
introduced in the original use case submitted by michiharu.
b
Polar Humenn wrote:
> It appears to me that this document merely describes a language, such that
> when a formula of the language is well formed, when evaluated against a
> specific valid input, yields a consistent result.
>
> What the PEP does with that result is up to the PEP. This advice should be
> non-normative. The normative part should only outline the specific manner
> in which obligations are collected in a particular way, according to the
> language, and delivered in the result.
>
> Cheers,
> -Polar
