isn't '[not evaluated]' an operational result?
WRT the [decision] truth table i would suggest: Target Condition Rule True True Effect True False Not Applicable True Indeterminate Indeterminate False Indeterminate Not Applicable Indeterminate Indeterminate Indeterminate since non-evaluation is by definition an undetermined decision.
b Anne Anderson wrote:
> I think this table is still not correct. If the target is > "False" or "Indeterminate", then the "Condition" is not even
> evaluated. >
> I suggest: >
> Target Condition Rule
> True True Effect
> True False Not Applicable
> True Indeterminate Indeterminate
> False [not evaluated] Not Applicable
> Indeterminate [not evaluated] Indeterminate >
> Anne >
-------
start of forwarded message
-------
>
From: Polar Humenn <>
>
To: XACML <>
>
Subject: Re: [xacml] [CR] Target Match Semantics Section 4 & 5
>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:48:05 -0400 (EDT) > > .... > > >>The rule truth table is shown in Table 1. >> >>Target Condition Rule >>True True Effect >>True False Not Applicable >>True Indeterminate Indeterminate >>False True Not Applicable >>False False Not Applicable >>False Indeterminate Indeterminate > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Not Applicable > >>Indeterminate True Indeterminate >>Indeterminate False Indeterminate >>Indeterminate Indeterminate Indeterminate >> >> Table 1 - Rule truth table > > > > >
----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: < http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl > > >
-------
end of forwarded message
-------
>
