> ..and the proposal is? ;-)
>
> I do share it to the point that I think we should freeze the
> description and list of the standard functions at the point
> it was at today's morning call and vote to accept it.
i was not on the call this morning and have not seen the minutes so i am
only going by what i see on the list. from this it appears that there
are still a number of issues on the table for discussion. if this
morning's meeting resulted in the agreement of scope for this section
then i will reconsider my position. as it stands at the moment however
this does not seem to be the case.
that said, my 'proposal' is to ask that you post to the list the
specifics of what you think we should limit the discussion to. that
would help clarify the situation (to me anyway :o)
thanks
b
