i am with you there. this whole 'error thing' seems to have taken on a
life of its own. for lack of a better phrase, errors can be very
personal things. i don't understand all of the relevant issues since it
is hard for me to absorb the discussion without a whiteboard, but it
seems to me that we are quickly merging onto the road to
non-interoperability; i posit that we are dabbling in operational issues
whereas we should be focused on access control description.
does anyone else share this concern?
b
Polar Humenn wrote:
> Aside from writing policies which depend on ERRORs happening, a policy
> writing methodology that I abhore, I would rather have a separate function
> called "on-error" specifying a value of a specific type.
>
> -Polar
