On 22 August, Ken Yagen writes: [xacml] XACML August 22, 2002 Minutes
> [Anne, 21 Aug 2002] Conformance Tests:
> Some was waiting on Daniel and Polar to complete functions.
> Anne suggests remove description of test suite and just state it is
V
from "Conformance (normative)" section of spec
> available. Test suite is an aid to developers who wish to attest to
> conforming to XACML. It is not required and Simon feels language should be
> made clearer to communicate that. Wording says that it is required for
> attestation of successfully using but not for conformance. Test suite is not
> as broad as conformance table. Attesting of successful use means you are
> passing the test suite. Conformance is determined independently. Hal
> suggests it should be the other way around. Anne said we want to avoid it
> seeming like a branding program. Other committees have not been concerned
> about interoperability or completeness in determining attesting of
> successfully using. Are the three implementers going to implement the
> complete mandatory sections?
Anne
--
Anne H. Anderson Email:
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
