Re: [xacml] request and response context schema

From
Simon Godik <>
Date
2002-05-16T13:25:22+00:00
ID
089c01c1fcdc$ce882c80$6401a8c0@C908876A
Thread
Re: [xacml] request and response context schema
Title: RE: [xacml] request and response context schema

Hi Carlisle,

 

1) In AttributeDesignator, should Issuer be a string or an anyURI?  
You currently have it as an anyURI but I wonder if string would be a better 
choice (note that it is a string in the SAML Assertion).

 

Issuer can be a string, although I prefer 
uri.

 

2) In ResourceSpecifier, 
I would suggest changing "ResourceURI" to something like "ResourceLocator", 
since this more clearly says what it is for.  Also, I would add another 
attribute called "ResourceName" (of type anyURI).

 

Could you please explain more what ResourceLocator 
will be used for?

 

3) It is not clear to me why DecisionType has been defined.  It 
seems to me that in many cases it will not give sufficient information (in 
particular, "Permit Read FileX" is not an appropriate answer if the question is 
"can Joe Read FileX?").

 

Do you think 'subject' should be included as well 
in 'decision-type'? I was thinking that subject could be matched

from the input context, but it also could be 
included in the output context.

 

4) If DecisionType is kept, Action should be of type string (not anyURI), 
and I would recommend adding the element AbstractPrincipal (to address my 
concern in (3)).  All three pieces of information (i.e., ResourceName, 
Action, and AbstractPrincipal) should be optional.

 

I agree that we could extend decision-type with 
principal information (see above).

Why do you think action should be made into a 
string? If it is a string we need additional attributes on the 
<action>

element to classify it.

 

Simon