RE: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...

Title: RE: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...

FYI, the state department did issue a travel warning regarding Milan recently:

http://travel.state.gov/italy_announce.html

Ken Yagen

Director, Software Development

CrossLogix, Inc

www.crosslogix.com

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Polar Humenn [mailto:] 

Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:58 AM

To: xacml list

Subject: RE: [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...

Great! Now, any clue about where to stay in Milan?

Cheers,

-Polar

On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Carlisle Adams wrote:

> Hi all,

>

> It's Monday morning, the votes are in, and here are the results...

>

> Firstly, we can trim down the choices somewhat:

>  - nobody seems to want to meet in San Francisco on the Saturday

> morning (it received no votes, although Bill indicated that it would 

> be as acceptable to him as any of the other 2.5-day options), so the 

> SF slot is W(pm)TF

>  - those voting for Milan either indicated no preference in days or chose

> (b) (the only exception was Simon, who chose (a), but I'm assuming he would

> not be opposed to (b)), so the Milan slot is MTW(am)

>

> Actual votes:

>  - Milan:  Anne, Ernesto, Michiharu, Pierangela, Bill, Don, Polar,

> Simon

> (8)

>  - SF:  Anne, Ken, Michiharu, Bill  (4)

>

> Extra information:

>  - I just spoke with Hal on the phone and he indicated that he could

> probably attend either location, though he had a slight preference for 

> California (he was on vacation all last week and so was not able to 

> cast a vote in time)

>  - Tim indicated to me that Entrust would send one person to Milan but 

> could conceivably send two to SF

>  - I assume that Don, Polar, and Simon (who all voted for Milan) could 

> also go to SF if the meeting was there

>

> Totals:

>  - with the extra information above, we have the following numbers

>     - Milan:  Anne, Ernesto, Michiharu, Pierangela, Bill, Don, Polar,

> Simon, [Hal, 1-from-Entrust]  (total = 10)

>     - SF:  Anne, Ken, Michiharu, Bill, [Hal, Don, Polar, Simon, 

> Carlisle, Tim]  (total = 10)

>

> Conclusion:

>  - potentially 10 people at either location, which would be quorum

>  - actual votes cast favoured Milan, and I did say that the most votes

> would win

>  - therefore, Milan is the winner!

>

> Next F2F date, location, and duration:

>  - {Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday morning}, April 22-24, 2002, University

> of Milan, Italy.

>

>

> Thanks to everyone for your participation!

>

> Carlisle.

>

> P.S., If anyone has serious objections my reasoning above, get them

> out now because those wanting 21-day advance bookings for cheaper 

> fares will probably need to book today...

>

>

> > ----------

> > From:       Carlisle Adams[SMTP:]

> > Sent:       Monday, March 25, 2002 1:02 PM

> > To:         xacml list; 'bill parducci'

> > Subject:    [xacml] Vote for XACML F2F Date, Location, and Duration...

> >

> > Hi all,

> >

> > Apologies for not getting this out earlier.  I had agreed to send

> > this after our TC concall last Thursday, but then was tied up the 

> > rest of that day and was traveling all day Friday.

> >

> >     ----------

> > From:   bill parducci[SMTP:]

> > Sent:   Sunday, March 24, 2002 10:18 PM

> > To:     xacml list

> > Subject:        [xacml] next f2f

> >

> >     is there a timeline and/or mechanism for determining when and where

> > the next f2f will occur? are we waiting for the next all-hands 

> > meeting? voting via e-mail?

> >

> >

> > Yes, I'm calling for an e-mail vote which will close first thing

> > Monday morning (April 1st).  That is, I'll count whatever's in my 

> > in-box when I get into work on Monday morning.  Votes should be sent 

> > to the list as a response to this message.

> >

> > There are a couple of things on which to vote.

> >

> > 1) Date and Location.  The choices are as follows (pick one):

> >        a) Mon.-Tue., April 22-23 in Milan, Italy (hosted by

> > Pierangela and Ernesto at U. Milan)

> >        b) Thu.-Fri., April 25-26 in San Francisco, USA (hosted by 

> > Ken Yagen at CrossLogix)

> >        c) either choice is acceptable

> >        d) I cannot attend either choice

> >

> > 2) Duration.  There has been a proposal to add an extra half day to

> > the meeting.  The choices are as follows (pick one):

> >

> >        a) MILAN:  Mon. afternoon, Tue. full day, Wed. full day

> >        b) MILAN:  Mon. full day, Tue. full day, Wed morning

> >        c) SF:  Wed. afternoon, Thu. full day, Fri. full day

> >        d) SF:  Thu. full day, Fri. full day, Sat. morning

> >        e) forget about the extra half day; two full days is enough

> >

> > The largest number of votes on each item wins.

> >

> > Our face-to-face meetings have been well-attended and very

> > productive so far; hopefully, we can continue this tradition.

> >

> > Carlisle.

> >

> >

>

----------------------------------------------------------------

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription

manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>