FW: [xacml] E-mail vote to close issues...

From
Carlisle Adams <>
Date
2002-04-09T14:52:22+00:00
ID
Thread
FW: [xacml] E-mail vote to close issues...
Title: FW: [xacml] E-mail vote to close issues...

----------

From:   Anne Anderson[SMTP:]

Sent:   Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:44 AM

To:     

Cc:     Anne Anderson

Subject:        Re: [xacml] E-mail vote to close issues...

Due to a reconfiguration of my desktop yesterday, my e-mail is

going out under a different e-mail address.  Due to this, my

mailing to  bounced.  I expect to have

the problem fixed within a day or so (by having my e-mail go out

under "" again), but in the meantime, could

you post this for me?

From: Anne Anderson <>

Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:16:47 -0400 (EDT)

To: XACML TC <>

Subject: Re: [xacml] E-mail vote to close issues...

PM-2-05: Ensuring Completeness (Anne and Polar)

  I vote for Polar's resolution, with Konstantin's "friendly

  amendment".

PM-3-04: Pseudo Code for Combiner Algorithms (Ernesto)

  I vote for Java simply because I think most of us (and most

  future XACML implementers and policy writers) do not know

  OCL. My second choice is C (or C++), if it seems more

  vendor-neutral.  I am happy to accept OCL, however, if that is

  what the majority wish.  I hope there are members who can help

  us compose it :-)

Otherwise, I vote for the resolutions included in Issues Version 6 for:

[BATCH#1]

PM-1-01-A: Implementing global deny and Meta-Policies 

PM-1-05: how NOT-APPLICABLE impacts a combinator expression

PM-1-07: how can the set of combinators be extended?

PM-2-01: Referencing Multiple Policies

PM-1-01: Negative Authorizations

PM-1-03: Post-Conditions as a term

PM-2-03: Meaningful Actions

PM-2-08: Outcome of policies and their combination

PM-3-01: Combining Policy Elements

PM-4-10: preserve PAP identity

PM-5-11: should we use a SAML assertion as a container for an

         XACML applicable policy.

PM-5-17: Boolean Expression of rules

PM-8-01: Internal v.s. External post conditions

PM-8-02: Mandatory v.s. advisory post conditions

PM-8-03: Inapplicable

PM-8-04: Base policy v.s. policy reference

PM-8-06: When to execute post condition

PM-8-07: Extension point

MI-1-01: Consistency

MI-1-02: Definition of Policy vs. Rule

I vote for the proposed resolutions as stated in BATCH#2:

MI-1-03: Definition and purpose of Target (Anne)

PM-2-06: Encapsulation of XACML policy (Anne)

PM-8-05: How to return obligation via SAML (Michiharu)

Anne

-- 

Anne H. Anderson             Email: 

Sun Microsystems Laboratories

1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928

Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692