OCL is a great idea. good call.
b
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 06:59, Beznosov, Konstantin wrote:
> I tend to agree with Bill's point that the language should not be
> vendor-specific. This is especially important if we want this standard
> be ever supported across the industry.
>
> However, I'm not sure how much we can leverage a specific programming
> language without getting trapped into the problem of providing
> compilable code. Isn't it better to use some formal, such as Z or OCL,
> language for such things? See
> http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~rej99/suprema/examples_main.htm for an example.
>
