Title: RE: [xacml] Minutes of 25 March Policy Model teleconference
Colleagues - I can issue a v12 whenever people request. Personally,
I prefer to incorporate a resolution to my concern about referencing attributes
in conditions into the next version. If we can have that discussion on
Monday, then I can issue v12 shortly afterwards. Any counter-proposals or
objections? All the best. Tim.
-----------------------------------------
Tim Moses
Tel:
613.270.3183
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlisle Adams
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002
1:19 PM
To: Tim Moses
Cc: XACML TC
Subject:
RE: [xacml] Minutes of 25 March Policy Model
teleconference
Hi,
----------
From: Tim Moses[SMTP:]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:01 PM
To:
'Anne Anderson';
XACML TC
Subject: RE: [xacml] Minutes of 25 March Policy Model
teleconference
Colleagues - I had to drop out after Item
24. Profound apologies. I had an "obligation", and
couldn't find a suitable element in which to include it. OASIS
precedent allows votes taken at a meeting that started with quorum to
stand (I believe).
This is true. Unless an
official call is made for a quorum count later in a meeting, the quorum that
was present at the start of the meeting is presumed to hold. So, there
is no need to vote again on items 25 and 26 in the minutes.
By the way, I am incorporating the resolution
of these issues in a version 12. I am interested to know what
people feel about the timing for the release of a version 12. Any
thoughts?
Given that this is a short week,
I suspect that having v0.12 in time for Monday's subcommittee call is
unreasonable. Would having it in time for the TC call on April 4th
make more sense?
Carlisle.
