i would suggest that this is 'practical syntactic comprehension'. for
example if the obligation states 'permit, but encode 3DES', the PEP
needs to have an internally actionable method that maps to the term
'encode' and that method must support 3DES. if not, an ERROR condition
arises (and i would assume a DENY would follow).
b
Polar Humenn wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Michiharu Kudoh wrote:
>
>
>
>>If the PEP does not understand an obligation, the PEP should deny
>>access.
>>
>
> I'm sorry. I really have a problem with this statement. "What is the
> specification of "understand"?
>
> -Polar
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
