← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [xacml] Discussion summary and revised post-condition proposa l

From
Bill Parducci
Date
2002-02-21T16:29:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xacml] Discussion summary and revised post-condition proposa l
Carlisle Adams wrote:
> Hi,
 >
> I've filled in the column for Policy C below.

[...]
>
Policy A
Policy B
Policy C
 >

------------------------------------
>
Permit
Permit
Permit:  P, R, and D
>
Permit
Deny
Deny:  S, E
>
Permit
Indeterminate
Indeterminate:  no obligations
>
Deny
Permit
Deny:  Q, E
>
Deny
Deny
Deny:  Q, S, E
>
Deny
Indeterminate
Deny:  Q, E
>
Indeterminate Permit
Indeterminate:  no obligations
>
Indeterminate Deny
Deny:  S, E
>
Indeterminate Indeterminate
Indeterminate:  no obligations

curious as to how you arrived at these:
>
Policy A
Policy B
Policy C
 >

------------------------------------
>
Permit
Indeterminate
Indeterminate:  no obligations
>
Indeterminate Permit
Indeterminate:  no obligations
>
Indeterminate Indeterminate
Indeterminate:  no obligations

given that policy C has this:

>
<All-must-permit>
>
Policy-A
>
Policy-B
>
</all-must-permit>

my read is that these would be resolved thus:

Policy A
Policy B
Policy C

------------------------------------

Permit
Indeterminate
Deny: E

Indeterminate Permit
Deny: E

Indeterminate Indeterminate
Deny: E

b

p.s. great example, polar!
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread