Re: [xacml] [model] Issues PM-2-02,PM-2-04: Applicability

Polar Humenn  <> wrote:
>But didn't we have some operator like  IF-THEN  > ><IF-THEN> >  <...>
>
a complex predicate that SHOULD NOT evaluate to n/a >  </...> >  <INAPPLICABLE/> ></IF-THEN> >
>It would have the same semantics as our applicability predicate.
>With added semantics if the premise evaluated to INAPPLICABLE then the
>entire expression is in Error.  I did propose the <if></if><then></then> syntax, but people found that confusing.  Since we already had the idea of  applicability rules  being in the  header  of the <applicablePolicy>, I thought perhaps having this more detailed  applicability rule  also in the header would be easier to swallow :-)  Anne