RE: [xacml] "Successfully Using XACML"...

From
<>
Date
2001-12-12T14:55:02+00:00
ID
706E6D4CEF75D31187D900805FC75F20CA8524@mercury_ii.ait.ca
Thread
RE: [xacml] "Successfully Using XACML"...
Title: "Successfully Using XACML"...

By 
"policy creation component" do you mean the ability 
to generate and export XACML policy for export for use by other applications? Or 
does the compliant application have to support an XACML natively and have 
an XACML editor?  

 

James MacLean

 

 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlisle Adams 
  [mailto:]
Sent: December 11, 2001 1:37 
  PM
To: ''
Subject: [xacml] 
  "Successfully Using XACML"...

  
Hi all, 

  
I had a pending action 
  item to propose a definition for the phrase "successfully using the XACML 
  specification".  As you may recall, we as a TC need to come to consensus 
  on the meaning of this so that when we submit our spec to OASIS for 
  progression, at least three of our members can put their hands on their hearts 
  and claim to OASIS that they are "successfully using the 
  specification".

  
My proposal is included 
  below.  I welcome comments on the list; eventually (sooner rather than 
  later!) we need to agree on a definition so that the implementers among us 
  know what to build...

  
Carlisle. 

  
8<------------------------------------ 

  
A set of test cases (each 
  test case consisting of a specific XACML policy instance, along with all 
  relevant inputs to the policy decision and the corresponding PDP output 
  decision) will be devised and included on the XACML Web site.

  
In order to be 
  "successfully using the XACML specification", an implementation MUST, for each 
  test case, have a "policy evaluation component" that can consume the policy 
  instance and the inputs and produce the specified output.  Furthermore, 
  the implementation MUST have a "policy creation component" which allows it to 
  produce schema-valid XACML policy instances.

  
Note that, aside from the 
  XACML policy instance itself, all PDP inputs and outputs MUST be 
  SAML-compliant (i.e., conform with the assertions and protocol messages 
  defined in the SS-TC SAML specification), although other syntaxes/formats for 
  the PDP input and output MAY be supported in addition to 
this.