i can make it.
b
Carlisle Adams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, we've tried for a little while with this topic -- both over e-mail
> and verbally on the last telecon -- and it looks like we're pretty far
> from consensus. Reduced travel budgets and other conference/meeting
> commitments have made it nearly impossible to find a date and place that
> are acceptable to the majority of the group.
>
> On the other hand, many members have expressed the strong opinion that
> another F2F this year is important to the progression of our work.
> (Sometimes you just need a whiteboard!)
>
> So, Hal and I have decided that we will try one last time with the
> proposal that has garnered the most votes so far (with the slight
> modification I requested earlier): a 2-day meeting in Las Vegas, from
> 1:00 p.m. Monday, Nov. 26 - noon Wednesday, Nov. 28. Most people should
> be able to fly in on Monday and fly out on Wednesday, if desired.
>
> The plan would be to have dial-in facilities for those who are not able
> to travel, but we still need sufficient attendees to make this
> worthwhile (otherwise, we might as well all dial in and just have a
> teleconference). My feeling is that 5 or 6 physical attendees should be
> the minimum.
>
> Now, a show of (electronic) hands: how many are able to make this date
> and time? Or should we just forget about a F2F until early next year?
> I think we need a decision this week. Please respond to the list by
> end-of-day Thursday; Hal and I will post the results on Friday, Nov. 9th.
>
> Carlisle, Hal.
>
