sorry, could you explain a little further? when you say that oracle's
jaxrpc impl has problems, what approach were you using that failed, and
what approach are you using now (if any)?
do you mean that you tried adding additional application fault fields,
and you reverted to using the soap fault "details"?
Andre Kramer wrote:
RE: [wsrp-interop] fault details
The JAX-RPC implementation used by Oracle had
problems with additional elements so we are limited to those defined
for SOAP 1.1. for now.
regards,
Andre
-----Original Message-----
From: jeff [mailto:]
Sent: 05 April 2004 23:40
To:
Subject: [wsrp-interop] fault details
hello,
can someone explain why the WSRP fault types do not
have a details,
reason, cause, message, etc field?
we've noticed that the faults from BEA's producers
come across with a
"details" section in the soap fault. this is most
helpful and we'd like
to replicate that behavior. however, since the wsrp
fault types do not
have such a field this producer must be doing
something like inserting
the details manually into the soap fault, or modifying
the wsrp types to
include details.
it is also possible that the producer's
implementation causes the WSRP
fault types to extend SOAPFaultException, which allows
details to be
added. however, we are using jaxrpc and our jaxrpc
expert assures us
that this violates the spec ... all application faults
must extend
Exception.
any help is appreciated.
thanks.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be
removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-interop/members/leave_workgroup.php.
