Title: RE: [wsrm] comment on 1.085jdak
Tom,
I second your opinion.
reagrding the options on the figures, i think we should change into a new set.
abbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rutt [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 1:46 PM
> To: wsrm
> Subject: [wsrm] comment on 1.085jdak
>
>
> In general I like the approach taken by Jacques.
>
> My only concern is that the figures 9, 10, and 11 in the http binding
> section for callback and poll do not show
> the rm-operations for Respond.
>
> Either:
> - the figures can be clarified as examples illustrating the
> use in the
> one-way soap mep case (the easiest approch), with an
> explanation that
> the corresponding figures for request/response mep are not shown, or
> - change to a new set of figures which have a dotted respond
> arrow with
> an explanation that the respond arrow is only used for
> request/response
> mep.
>
> In any case there needs to be a statement that the sending
> and receiving
> RMP must know when an application response is required for
> the operation.
>
>
> Tom Rutt
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt email: ;
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from
> the roster of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leav
e_workgroup.php.
