Clarification of RM-faults without ackRequested

At last week's teleconference, it was agreed we have to clarify whether 
rm fault indications can be sent if the request
does not include the ackRequested element.

The replyPattern element is mandatory, implying that there will be 
behaviours which require an rm-reply, even if ackRequested
is not present.

The Sending RMP should be made aware when it sends request elements in a 
message which are badly formed

This I propose we add the following sentence after the first paragraph 
of section 4.2.4 AckRequested

"
The Receiving RMP MAY publish an rm-fault indication for a reliable 
message, even if the AckRequested element is not present in the request 
element for that message.
"

Tom Rutt

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt	email: ; 
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133