Title: RE: [wsrm] Proposed clarificaiton resolutions to Ferris comments 1,2
Tom,
I really do not want to be a pain here, so I will be ok with the WG choice.
abbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rutt [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 12:08 PM
> To: Barbir, Abbie [CAR:1A11:EXCH]
> Cc: Jacques Durand; WSRM (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [wsrm] Proposed clarificaiton resolutions to
> Ferris comments 1,2
>
>
> perhaps "initiates" rather than "manages"
>
> However, I thing Controls is close to the correct verb. I prefer
> controls, or initates, to manages, because managment implies many
> operations.
>
> Tom Rutt
>
> Abbie Barbir wrote:
>
> > see inline,
> > abbie
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > *From:* Jacques Durand [mailto:]
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 14, 2004 8:26 PM
> > *To:* WSRM (E-mail)
> > *Subject:* [wsrm] Proposed clarificaiton resolutions to Ferris
> > comments 1,2
> >
> > Tom:
> >
> > inline <JD>,
> > suggested updates on your proposal responding to Chris F. (here,
> > for comments #1 and #2 only).
> >
> > It also appears that our definition of "Notify" in
> Section 1.5 is
> > too general, as we never intended to use Notify
> > to report on successful deliveries - as Chris assumes - but only
> > on failed deliveries, as described later in the spec.
> > So I narrow it accordingly in 1.5 below.
> >
> > -Jacques
> >
> > -------------------------
> > From: Tom Rutt []
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 1:59 PM
> > To: wsrm
> > Subject: [wsrm] Proposed clarificaiton resolutions to
> Ferris comments
> > 1,2,24,5,7,9,16,19
> >
> > Proposed resolutions for some of Chris Ferris comments on
> > WS-Reliability
> > ED 1.05:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > Deliver:
> >
> > An abstract operation associated with a Receiving RMP. When
> > invoked, the
> > operation makes the payload of one Reliable Message
> available to the
> > Consumer from the Receiving RMP. For example, in one specific
> > implementation choice, the payload is placed into a queue by the
> > Receiving RMP to be consumed by an application component.
> >
> > <JD> The "associated with a Receiving RMP" might still be
> > misinterpreted.
> > I would replace 1st sentence with:
> > "An abstract operation that controls a transfer from
> Receiving RMP
> > to Consumer."
> >
> > <ab> I agree , the term associated is mileading. However, I also
> > think controls is still misleading. How about, "An abstract
> > operation that manage a transfer from ...)
> >
> > Submit:
> >
> > An abstract operation associated with a Sending RMP.
> When invoked,
> > the
> > operation transfers payload data from the Producer to
> the Sending RMP
> > (e.g., a request to the Sending RMP to take
> responsibility for the
> > Reliable Message).
> >
> > <JD> I would replace 1st sentence with:
> > "An abstract operation that controls a transfer from Producer to
> > Sending RMP."
> >
> > <ab> same change as above
> >
> >
> >
> > Respond:
> >
> > An abstract operation associated with a Receiving RMP. When
> > invoked, the
> > operation transfers payload data from the Consumer to a
> Receiving
> > RMP.
> >
> > <JD> I would replace 1st sentence with:
> > "An abstract operation that controls a transfer from Consumer to
> > Receiving RMP."
> >
> > <ab> same change as above
> >
> > Notify:
> >
> > An abstract operation associated with a Sending RMP.
> When invoked,
> > the
> > operation makes available a response payload received
> by the Sending
> > RMP, to the Producer, or makes available to the Producer the
> > status of a
> > Reliable Message (e.g., a notification that the Sending
> RMP failed to
> > send a Reliable Message).
> >
> > <JD> similarly,
> > "An abstract operation that controls a transfer from Sending RMP
> > to Producer."
> > plus a narrowing: replace "the status" by "the failure status".
> >
> > <ab> same change as above
> >
> >
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt email: ;
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
>
>
>
>
