Comments on WS-R by Chris Ferris in his presentation accepted by the TC as public comment

Pubic review comments from Chris Ferris:

 

Cf1:  Two schemas and namespaces are unnecessary for two
soap versions.

 

 

Cf2:  Why are soap faults not used for RM-Fault?

 

 

Cf3: Not Acking until delivery to the application causes
unnecessary delays?

            

 

Cf4: Unclear if the spec can compose with WS-Addressing or
WS-MD?

 

 

Cf5: Persistence model will not work on devices with non
volatile storage?

 

 

Cf6:  Mandatory Expiry time requires synchronization of
clocks:

 

 

Cf7:  There is unnecessary complexity in the spec, headers
have unnecessary elements 

making them larger than necessary?

 

 

Cf8: The spec does not state that every delivered message
MUST be acknowledged.