RE: [wsrm] Rel-113 (Message delivery/processing after fault)

Sunil:

Case 1- a message requires an Ack, 
yet the receiver does not implement this feature. 
Should the Receiver drop the message and just 
send back the Fault? Why not deliver 
the message? 
 

  
 It all should  depend on the mustUnderstand (mU) attribute. If 
  the mU=1, and the 
 receiver doesn't understand it, then it MUST 
  generate a Fault and message should 
 not be delivered. 
[Jacques 
  Durand] I realize that we always generate a SOAP fault for every RM fault 
  header element (should we make that more explicit in spec). If that is teh 
  case then yes, although the decision how to interpret "understand" being the 
  RMP decision, the level of processing done to the message before deciding of a 
  fault could include delivery to upper layer if we wanted.

  
In 
  any case, I agree now we should not "RMP-deliver" on a 
  fault...

  

 If mU=0, then if the receiver understands it, then it will 
  deliver and send an Ack. back 
 and if if the receiver doesn't 
  understand it, it MUST still deliver the message. 
[Jacques 
  Durand] I believe we always require mU=1 for RM headers, so that case 
  should not occur? If "does not understand" means an RM failure, we would not 
  deliver I guess - I think you talk about the SOAP node "delivery" , not 
  RMP delivery.

  
 

  
 

    
Jacques