Tom Rutt wrote:
> From the f2f minutes for the resolution of Rel 22
> "Doug: we only use MUST, MAY, SHOULD, OPTIONAL only to characterise
> behaviour.
>
> Ø ACTION: Iwasa will change MAY OPTIONAL for parameters to use
> cardinality instead, for the entire document.
>
> "
>
> The wording "xxx element MAY be Present in www" or "yyy attribute MAY
> be present in zzz" , or "aaa MUST be present in bbb" still occurs
> throughout section 3.
>
> To fully reflect the resolution to Rel 22 from the F2F these wordings
> need to be changed throughout section 3 to behaviour statements for
> the Sender.
I just realized, that if the element or attribute is part of an rm-reply
(ack or fault) then the wording should use "receiver" instead of "sender"
In cases where a sentence talks about both a reply and request, then
the term "RMP" could be used in the behaviour statement.
>
> Eg: change the above three wordings as follows
> "The Sender MAY include xxx element in www", or "The Sender MAY
> include yyy attribute in zzz" or "The sender MUST include aaa in bbb"
>
> Tom Rutt
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt email: ;
Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
