RE: [wsrm] Why does Poll Request need Message header

Title: RE: [wsrm] Why does Poll Request need Message header

+1, 

Even if the pollrequest is piggybacked, 

an RM message header should not have meaning for the poll, but for

the business message. 

Jacques

-----Original Message-----

From: Tom Rutt [mailto:]

Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:32 AM

To: wsrm

Subject: [wsrm] Why does Poll Request need Message header

We agreed that the rm response, which is not itself a reliable message, 

should not send the Message Header.

We moved the reply pattern to be an attribute of the response header.

Now I ask a new question,  if a poll request is not piggybacked on a 

reliable message request., why does it need a message header?

There is no meaning to expiry time for the poll request, and there is no 

need for a message id for the poll request itself.

It would simplify the protocol if the poll request message, which is not 

itself piggybacked on a new reliable message request, does not include

the request header.

What do you think of this?

Tom Rutt

-- 

----------------------------------------------------

Tom Rutt                email: ; 

Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php.