Re: [wsrm] [Appendix A] Editorial

Sunil Kunisetty <> wrote at Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:27:57 -0800:
> Tony Graham wrote:
> > Sunil Kunisetty <> wrote at Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:28:02 -0800:
> > > Tony Graham wrote:
> > ...
> > > > Line 1693
> > > >
> > > >    The name 'EmptyType' makes me think it is defining something for an
> > > >    empty element.  Is there a different name that can be used?
> > > >    'CommonType'?  'BaseType'?  'DefaultType'?  'SequenceType'?
...
>  Also, this is not a exposed element (just an internal element
>  name), so it shouldn't be that big a deal what we call it.

You are correct.  As I said, I noticed it first in Tom's samples, not
in the Appendix A schema itself.

I have no quibble with keeping the current name.

Regards,


Tony Graham
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Products, Technologies and Standards           Phone: +353 1 8199708
Sun Microsystems                                              x(70)19708
East Point Business Park, Dublin 3, Ireland