Discussion of Conformance Points for WS-Reliability

I propose just two levels of conformance for WS-Reliability message 
receivers:

Simple: The receiver can handle guaranteed delivery requests
Full:     The receiver can handle any WS-Relibility request

A receiving implementation may claim conformance as a Simple receiver, 
or as a Full receiver.

A sender would only have to implement the portions of the protocol that 
they use, as indicated
by the QOS request parameters they select.  Thus we do not need 
conformance classes for  senders.

What do you think?


-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt		email: ; 
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133