Iwasa,
Ack. is ALWAYS included in the Response element and MessageHeader
has to exist for every RM message. This is the case even for piggybacking.
The difference between a normal ack. and piggybacked ack. is that, in the
latter case the (ack|fault) response is sent along with another requeust,
which means it will have a MessageHeader, Request, and Response element.
A normal ack. just has a MessageHeader and Response
The same applies for Faults (the difference being instead of using Response
element, we will be usiing the Fault element) also except that for a SOAP 1.2
RM msg, we never use the Fault element.
HTH,
-Sunil
iwasa wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm working on the examples. And I think I need to make
> sure that:
> 1) The Acknowledgment message is including
> Response element, but not MessageHeader element
> except piggybacking. Is this correct?
> 2) The Fault message is including Fault element,
> but not MessageHeader element exept piggybacking.
> Is this also correct?
>
> There is no statement for 2) above in the spec.
>
> If there is no argument, I will include some text to resolve
> this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Iwasa
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php.
