Tom Rutt wrote:
> Based on our current thinking, we are not sending an ack until the
> message is actually delivered.
>
> Thus in the ordered delivery held waiting for prior message state, an
> RMP may receive several
> retransmits of that held, and thus not acknowledged message.
>
> In such a case, the receiving rmp should respond to sending rmp
> regarding its receipt of the duplicate message with an appropirate
> DuplicateMessage fault.
say a new fault "duplicate received for message held waiting for prior
message in sequence"
>
>
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but I think we need to clean up the
> semantics of this from what is in the current draft.
>
> Tom Rutt
>
--
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt email: ;
Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
