Re: [wsrm] New issue and proposed resolution

From
John Fuller <>
Date
2003-10-24T11:20:49+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [wsrm] New issue and proposed resolution
Alternately can we specify a maximum size at, say, 255
for fields that can be demoted to string literals (guids, uris, etc)?

While it's easy to handle in memory dynamically,
a lot of databases sort of force you to establish the maximum
size for a field.



On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 04:45 AM, iwasa wrote:

> I got a new issue from our development team
> who is implementing WS-R spec.
>
> Issue:
> Since the spec doesn't define the max length
> of GroupId, some implementation may
> fail to deal with some length of GroupId.
>
> Proposed Resolution:
>  -Add the following text to the spec:
>   When RMP received a message with GroupId
>   or RefToGroupId which value is longer than
>   the implementation can handle, the RMP MUST
>   send back a Fault message with "GroupIdTooLong".
>
> --
> Any comments?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Iwasa
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster  
> of the OASIS TC), go to  
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/ 
> leave_workgroup.php.
>