WS-Reliability is a bad name (for the spec. and for this TC) because it can
be read as meaning we address all aspects of reliability for Web services,
which we obviously don't do. I hate to say it, but Web Services Reliable
Messaging does covey exactly the right connotations.
Mark.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark D. Hansen" <>
To: "WSRM-TC (E-mail)" <>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 3:26 AM
Subject: [wsrm] Name of this technical committee / standard ...
> Which is the official name of this technical committee and this
> standard?
>
> (1) Web Services Reliability (WS-Reliability)
> ... or ...
> (2) Web Services Reliable Messaging (WSRM)
>
> Maybe we should stick with (1) because (2) looks too much like the
> IBM/Microsoft effort called Web Services Reliable Messaging Protocol
> (WS-ReliableMessaging).
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> -- Mark
>
> Mark Hansen
> email:
>
>
