Re: [wsrm] article comparing ws-reliability and ws-reliable messaging

From
Chiusano Joseph <>
Date
2003-04-01T16:01:52+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [wsrm] article comparing ws-reliability and ws-reliable messaging
I had the same question when I read the article. 

Also, I am working on a detailed comparison (a crosswalk) of the 3
current reliable message specs (WS-Reliability, WS-ReliableMessaging and
BEA's WS-Acknowledgement) and hope to complete it within the next 2
weeks. It will basically list functionality (such as "Persistent
Storage", "Duplicate Messages", etc.) and compare how each of the 3
specifications address the functionality (and if they do not). I will
send it to our list as soon as it is complete.

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

Tom Rutt wrote:
> 
> Where did the author get the justification for "totally incompatible"?
> 
> Tom Rutt
> 
> Carol McDonald wrote:
> > article comparing ws-reliability  and ws-reliable messaging
> >
> > http://www.it-director.com/article.php?id=3647
> >
> 
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt                email: ; 
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133