SHOULD means that one needs a good reason
for not implementing the guidance. An example of such a good reason is
reusing faults which were defined elsewhere.
Rich Thompson
Samuel Meder <>
05/16/05 11:56 AM
To
wsrf-oasis <>
cc
Subject
[wsrf] Issue 100
I've changed the MUST to a SHOULD, but am wondering if the current
text isn't still to restrictive. Even with the change to a SHOULD it
seems to imply that all faults declared in WSDL MUST be a Base Fault.
Can I assume that the spirit of the resolution was to allow the
declaration of non-BaseFaults faults in WSDL?
/Sam
