Unit,
On 29 Mar 2005, at 3:32, Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
> <umit> I think it is imperative that we make this clear in wording in
> the SG, since the "bag" but "not set" of members concept somehow
> escaped me.
>
> </umit>
Would it help to actually use the mathematics terminology? We debated
this several times back in the OGSI days. The spec currently reads in
section 5, line 238:
A member MAY belong to the same ServiceGroup more than once.
I would be happy to extend this with " e.g. 'bag' rather than a 'set'
semantics."
How do people feel?
--
Take care:
Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu . com >
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe
Hayes Park Central
Hayes End Road
Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE
+44-208-606-4649 (Office)
+44-208-606-4539 (Fax)
+44-7768-807526 (Mobile)
