Which one is a good question. We
either resolve Issue WSRF43 and move to WS-Addressing version submitted
to W3C (my recommendation). In doing this task, we could consider what
(if any) role reference parameters plays.
sgg
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
Anish Karmarkar <>
wrote on 08/12/2004 03:52:59 AM:
> Which one? There are now three versions of WS-Addressing.
> Pl. note that the latest version has a new concept of 'Reference
> parameters' which is very similar to 'Reference properties' except
when
> it comes to comparing EPRs.
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Steve Graham wrote:
>
> >
> > David:
> > Good question. I would recommend that we continue with the IRP
> > clarification, but build only WS-Addressing embodiments.
> >
> > sgg
> >
> > ++++++++
> > Steve Graham
> > (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> > STSM, On Demand Architecture
> > Member, IBM Academy of Technology
> > <Soli Deo Gloria/>
> > ++++++++
> >
> >
> > David Hull <> wrote on 08/10/2004 03:42:25
PM:
> >
> > > How does this relate to the assertion that the IRP
is too tightly
> > bound up with its
> > > WS-Addressing embodiment?
> > >
> > > Steve Graham wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks:
> > > Please see: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/05/.
> > > This is a submission request to the W3C by BEA, IBM,
Microsoft, SAP
> > and Sun to
> > > submit WS-Addressing to W3C as input to the standardization
process.
> > >
> > > I would like to recommend that we consider using WS-Addressing
as
> > submitted to the
> > > W3C in our work in WS-RF and WS-N. Note, our
use of WSDL 1.1 (which
> > was a
> > > submission to W3C, just like WS-Addressing is now)
is a precedence
> > for this sort of
> > > pre-requisite.
> > >
> > > I formally move that we use WS-Addressing as our only
means of
> > reference mechanism.
> > > In particular, I propose that we avoid abstracting
the reference
> > mechanism, such as
> > > BPEL has done, in light of this submission of WS-Addressing
to W3C.
> > Note, this
> > > minimizes the perturbation to the currently specified
message
> > exchanges, and
> > > reduces migration impediments for implementations
that are building
> > to the 1.1 and
> > > 1.2 versions of our specifications.
> > >
> > > sgg
> > >
> > > ++++++++
> > > Steve Graham
> > > (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> > > STSM, On Demand Architecture
> > > Member, IBM Academy of Technology
> > > <Soli Deo Gloria/>
> > > ++++++++
