All,
How do the changes in the submitted
version of WS-Addressing affect WS-RF? It seems that WS-Addressing now has a
canonical way of reasoning about EPR equivalence. Will WS-RF continue to use “reference
properties” for its IRP requirements or will it have to move to “reference
parameters”?
Regards,
--
Savas Parastatidis
http://savas.parastatidis.name
From:
Steve Graham [mailto:]
Sent: 10 August 2004 20:25
To:
Cc:
Subject: [wsrf] WS-Addressing
submitted to W3C as input
Folks:
Please
see: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/05/.
This
is a submission request to the W3C by BEA, IBM, Microsoft, SAP and Sun to
submit WS-Addressing to W3C as input to the standardization process.
I
would like to recommend that we consider using WS-Addressing as submitted to
the W3C in our work in WS-RF and WS-N. Note, our use of WSDL 1.1 (which
was a submission to W3C, just like WS-Addressing is now) is a precedence for
this sort of pre-requisite.
I
formally move that we use WS-Addressing as our only means of reference
mechanism. In particular, I propose that we avoid abstracting the reference
mechanism, such as BPEL has done, in light of this submission of WS-Addressing
to W3C. Note, this minimizes the perturbation to the currently specified
message exchanges, and reduces migration impediments for implementations that
are building to the 1.1 and 1.2 versions of our specifications.
sgg
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
