RE: [wsbpel-comment] non-XML format message (soap with attachment)

Hi Diane,

 

  Only comments received during the official public 
review period need to be incorporated into the log; that doesn't mean that you 
can't include it/respond to it, only that you aren't required 
to.

 

Regards,

 

Mary

  

  
  From: Diane Jordan [mailto:] 
  
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:50 AM
To: 
  
Cc: 
  
Subject: Fw: [wsbpel-comment] non-XML 
  format message (soap with attachment)

  

Mary, 
Please advise on the protocol for handling this 
  relative to the public review.  Should it be included in the "official" 
  public comments records we've been keeping given that it came in after the 
  closure of the second public review?       

Regards, Diane
IBM  Emerging Internet 
  Software Standards

(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 
  919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 01/25/2007 
  08:44 AM ----- 

  
    
    

      "Jingfeng Li" 
        <> 
        
01/25/2007 02:50 AM 

      
        
          
          

            
              
To

             
          

            
              
cc

            
          

            
              
Subject

            [wsbpel-comment] non-XML format 
              message (soap with attachment)

        
          
          

            
            

In the current version of the spec, it implies that the message is 
  XML
format.
The "validate" can be used to perform the validation 
  checking of the XML
format
message.

But, what happens if the 
  message is a soap with attachment? For example, how
to check its format, or 
  do something like query some part of 
its?