Re: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-comment] IPR for WS-BPEL2.0]

>Danny van der Rijn wrote: I know there's a process by which this all gets revealed, but could someone 
>remind me (and Matsumoto-san) of it?
>
>Thanks
>Danny
>  
>
mm1: Irrespective of our decided action, should we not open the issue 
with this public comment? Thanks.

>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: 	[wsbpel-comment] IPR for WS-BPEL2.0
>Date: 	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:07:48 -0700
>From: 	Shigeaki Matsumoto <>
>To: 	<>
>
>
>
>WS-BPEL Committee members -
>
>I am interested in the status of IPR for WS-BPEL2.0.
>
>I found IPR policy page as below, but I wonder if the statement is limited
>to WS-BPEL1.1.
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsbpel/ipr.php
>
>I have some questions:
> Q1. Are there any essential patents to implement WS-BPEL2.0?
> Q2. IPR agreements were necessary for WS-BPEL1.1.  Are the same IPR
>agreements necessary for also WS-BPEL2.0?
>
>Would you be so kind as to take a moment to respond this questionnaire and
>return it to me ?
>Your response will help me to use WS-BPEL2.0 or not.
>If you foresee any problem with this request, please let me know.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Shigeaki Matsumoto
>NEC Corporation
>11-5 Shibaura 2-chome, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 108-8557, Japan
>
>
>
>This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
>OASIS Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WSBPEL) TC.
>
>In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
>to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
>before posting.
>
>Subscribe: 
>Unsubscribe: 
>List help: 
>List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel-comment/
>Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
>List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=wsbpel
>
>  
>