Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [wsbpel] WS-BPEL IPR

From
John Evdemon <>
Date
2006-01-16T16:03:11+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsbpel] WS-BPEL IPR
Sorry for the confusion - I'll get this fixed ASAP!

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yuzo Fujishima [mailto:] 
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 10:36 PM
> To: ws bpel tc
> Subject: [wsbpel] WS-BPEL IPR
> 
> To: John and Diane
> Cc: WSBPEL TC members
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I know this is not everyone's favorite topic (I don't like it
> either!), but forgive me to say something regarding WS-BPEL IPR.
> 
> 1. Microsoft licensing terms link is dead.
> 
> In
>   http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsbpel/ipr.php
> there is a link to Microsoft licensing terms
>   http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices/docs/bpel_license.asp
> but the link is dead.
> 
> Could you confirm the link and have it fixed? > John?
> 
> 2. Disclosures and licensing terms for WS-BPEL 2.0.
> 
> So far, disclosures and licensing terms publication have been 
> done only for BPEL4WS 1.1.
> 
> I guess disclosures must be done also for WS-BPEL 2.0 by any
> participating party if it has essential claims. Am I right?
> 
> As for WS-BPEL 2.0 IPR licensing terms, can I assume that 
> they are the same as (or hopefully, weaker than) those for 
> BPEL4WS 1.1?
> 
> Yuzo Fujishima
> NEC Corporation
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all 
> your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
oups.php 
> 
>
Next in thread → Next in month →