← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Issue 207.1 - split from Issue 207 - generalize a compensation instance handler

From
Peter Furniss <>
Date
2006-01-14T13:45:14+00:00
ID
04e401c61910$bbd88c20$
Thread
Issue 207.1 - split from Issue 207 - generalize a compensation instance handler
Title: Message

This 
is now 207.1

 

Peter

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Jordan 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: 12 January 2006 19:34
To: 
  
Cc: 
  
Subject: Fw: [wsbpel] Issue 207 - new 
  subissue to generalize a compensation instance 
  handler

Hi Peter, 
  
The TC decided to open this issue at the f2f 
  today so it can move directly to the open issue list.  Thanks! 
  
Regards, Diane
IBM  Emerging Internet Software 
  Standards

(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 
  919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 01/12/2006 
  02:31 PM ----- 

  
    
    

      Alex Yiu 
        <> 
        
01/12/2006 11:18 AM 

      
        
          
          

            
              
To

            Dieter Koenig1 
              <> 
          

            
              
cc

            , Alex Yiu 
              <> 
          

            
              
Subject

            Re: [wsbpel] Issue 207 
              - new subissue to generalize a compensation instance 
          handler

        
          
          

            
            

Hi all,

Request to open a new subissue 
  207.1

-------------------------
In Dieter's proposal, a concept is 
  formally described as "Compensation 
Handler Instance Group". This concept 
  is currently applied to 
child-scope repeatable construct only (e.g. 
  <while>) compensated by 
<compensateScope> (scope-specific 
  compensation).

Actually, the same concept can be generalized to 
  describe the group of 
compensation handler instances used in the default 
  compensate 
<compensate />. It will make the compensation model even 
  easier for 
users to understand.

I would suggest to generalize 
  "Compensation Handler Instance Group" desc 
and move that paragraph to an 
  earlier section and reuse it to describe 
what happen if a fault happen in 
  a default compensation as 
  well.
-------------------------

Thanks!

Regards,
Alex 
  Yiu

Dieter Koenig1 wrote:

>Updated specification text for 
  the resolution of issues 207, 216, 
  226.
>
>Reference:
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/16181/-%20WS-BPEL%202.0%20Specification%20Draft%20September%201%20%28DK%20Updates%20in%2013.3%20%2B%2013.4%2C%20Jan%2011%29.doc
>
>Kind 
  Regards
>DK
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To 
  unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC 
  that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all 
  your TCs in 
  OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
  
>
> 
   
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
  unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates 
  this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
  OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →