Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 162 - Proposal For Vote

From
Danny van der Rijn <>
Date
2006-01-04T18:14:20+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 162 - Proposal For Vote
Issue 162 - Unique Activity Names for Compensate

Proposal: Add text to section 13.3.3 "Invoking a Compensation Handler" to
clarify that activity names used in a compensate activity must be unique
within the scope.

Rationale: Currently, there is no constraint on activity names, i.e. the
activity name (standard attribute) does not have to be unique. As a result,
a compensate activity may become ambigous:
    scope
        compensationHandler
            compensate "A" <-- don't know which one
        scope name="A" <-- first enclosed scope
        scope name="A" <-- second enclosed scope


Kind Regards
DK


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.