I remain warm (to the idea I mean).
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Yiu [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:00 PM
To: Danny van der Rijn
Cc: ; 'Dieter Koenig1'; 'ws bpel tc';
Alex Yiu; Satish Thatte
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 229 - Proposal for vote
Hi Danny and others,
I have been thinking of renaming "<compensate />" activity to something
like "<compensateChildScopes/>" to signal the difference two forms of
compensation and avoid confusion, instead of saying a verbal description
like "a compensate activity with no scope attribute"
What do you guys think?
Based on some past email exchange, Satish is warm to that idea.
If you guys are warm to idea, we could incorporate that into one of
compensation related proposal. That is, to instruct editors to do a
global scan on the term "compensate" in the spec to apply changes
appropriate. [Poor editors ... :-( ... including myself ...]
Thanks!
Regards,
Alex Yiu
Danny van der Rijn wrote:
