I propose we close issue 96 with no action.
Issue 96 was intended to primarily address the question of how to handle
asynchronous request/response correlation in BPEL. It also would have
provided a foundation for enabling BPEL to support multi-message
conversation protocols but that was a secondary goal.
The WS-Addressing WG has taken it as a work item to extend WSDL 1.1 to
support asynchronous request/response MEPs. The exact method for doing
this is still to be determined. However whatever they do will enable
WSDL 1.1 to express asynchronous request/response semantics directly.
Once that happens those semantics can be mapped to BPEL
request/responses. This would satisfy the primary issue 96 was intended
to address.
Yaron
