In the modified version of the proposal I'm about to release it will
always be possible to properly interpret and enforce link structures and
all other standard BPEL attributes and elements.
Yaron
Francisco Curbera wrote:
> I would repeat Danny's comment to this solution: assuming you don't
> understand the namespace of the extension (and assuming the extension is
> ignorable, as per issue 92) you loose the ability to interpret the link
> structure of the process. Putting the strandard elements/attributes on the
> extensionActivity element avoids this problem (this was Alex' option 3):
>
> <extensibleActivity standard-attributes>
> standard-elements
> <???? >
> ...
> </????>
> </extensibleActivity>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Yaron Y.
> Goland"
>
>
> <> To: wsbpeltc
> <>
>
>
> cc:
>
>
> 05/25/2005 03:26 Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 111 -
> Proposal For Vote
>
>
> PM
>
>
> Please respond
> to
>
>
>
> ygoland
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I re-raise my original proposal -
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200503/msg00188.html
>
> Yaron
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
