I will soon submit a modified proposal that uses the term
"extensionActivityWrapper" and also clarifies that the empty semantics
only applies to activities that are not marked 'mustUnderstand'.
Yaron
Alex Yiu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 but with two potentially friendly amendments:
>
> (1)
> Do a global replacement from "extensibleActivity" to
> "extensionActivityWrapper".
> I believe the new term is a better description.
>
> (2)
> Change the following text in the proposal
> FROM:
> "If the element contained within the extensibleActivity element is not
> recognized then
> the unknown activity MUST be treated as if it were an empty activity."
>
> TO:
> "If the element contained within the extensibleActivity element is not
> recognized then
> the unknown activity MUST be treated according to the extension
> declaration of the corresponding namespace."
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Regards,
> Alex Yiu
>
>
> Yaron Y. Goland wrote:
>
> > I re-raise my original proposal -
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200503/msg00188.html
> >
> > Yaron
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> > OASIS
> > at:
> > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
